September 27, 2009

TRUMBULL STICKNEY.

I had never heard of the poet Trumbull Stickney, which is not surprising, since he died in 1904 at the age of thirty having published only one volume of verse (Dramatic Verses, Boston: Charles E. Goodspeed, 1902). I discovered him, as I discover many good things, at wood s lot, where you can find two of his poems in today's post (the sonnet "The melancholy year is dead with rain" and "Mnemosyne"); they are as good as anything Pound wrote before he discovered his true voice in Cathay, and what might Stickney's true voice have turned out to be like once he'd shaken off the clinging tendrils of the nineteenth century? Fruitless speculation, of course, but one late fragment raises the hair on my neck in the way only true poetry can:

Sir, say no more.
Within me 't is as if
The green and climbing eyesight of a cat
Crawled near my mind's poor birds.

Posted by languagehat at September 27, 2009 10:42 AM
Comments

one's whole existence left in the combination of some few magical words, he achieved his trace 'material buddhahood' and that's enough imho

Posted by: read at September 27, 2009 11:54 AM

Hmph. You probably haven't heard of Adelaide Crapsey either.

Posted by: John Emerson at September 27, 2009 12:00 PM

i've found AC's Verse through wiki&google books, thanks

Posted by: read at September 27, 2009 12:25 PM

I was vaguely familiar with her via Robert Frost. Anyway, she had six more years to poetize.

Posted by: language hat at September 27, 2009 05:04 PM

Stickney had been diagnosed with brain cancer when he wrote that fragment.

Crapsey is largely forgettable.

Posted by: j. del col at September 28, 2009 12:50 PM

Stickney had been diagnosed with brain cancer when he wrote that fragment.
so what? does it devalue his verse?

Crapsey is largely forgettable.
poor her, can't be remembered by the modern literati

Posted by: read at September 28, 2009 01:16 PM

The poem was inspired by his illness. That's all I was pointing out.

Crapsey's work isn't well known, because most of it isn't very good.

Posted by: j. del col at September 28, 2009 01:58 PM

what's good and bad in poetry, how one can measure and mark poems
one writes and reads poems for oneself to honour the emotion, feeling or whatever it invokes, not to be remembered by the future generations
if even one person reads the poem and feels the same feeling it's enough for the poem to be written and read
if you don't feel the same, fine, just don't bad-mouth another's work

Posted by: read at September 28, 2009 02:28 PM

The desire to be considered "good" by posterity is not the only reason to write poetry, or for that matter create any type of art. I was surprised to find out that Crapsey was known for developing an American form of the cinquain, a poetry form that is easy to teach ESL students that makes creating in English very accessible. One cinquain much linked to is "Triad". Another form she created was a couplet form of epigram, an example is "On Seeing Weather-Beaten Trees". More of Adelaide Crapsey here.

Posted by: Nijma at September 28, 2009 05:28 PM

maybe the meter, but it felt very close to me
as if she was a reincarnation of some mute inglorious Asian peasant :)
we have the triads in our folklore too, must be someone was trying his/her mind compiling them anonymously
and from the first link, TS's "I heard a dead leaf run. It crossed / My way. For dark I could not see. / It rattled crisp and thin with frost / Out to the lea."
that's almost like how our poetry sounds (as far as my incomplete English can judge of course)

Posted by: read at September 28, 2009 05:45 PM

maybe the meter
The type of cinquain I gave my class was
Line 1: one word--the subject, usually a noun
Line 2: two words--describes the subject
Line 3: three words--action of the subject
Line 4: four words--an emotion about the subject
Line 5: one word--restates the whole thing

example in French:

Chien
Optimiste perpetual
Attend son maitre
Il entend des pas…
Joie!

[Dog
Perpetual optimist
Waiting for his master
He hears steps
Joy]

Crapsey's type of cinquains have two syllables in the first line, then four, six, eight, and then two in the last line. The number of stressed syllables is one, two, three, four, and one. Like in a haiku, the requirements of the short format can make the subject more condensed and focused.

Posted by: Nijma at September 28, 2009 07:29 PM

Do the Mongolian triads have exact requirements?

Posted by: Nijma at September 28, 2009 07:30 PM

http://www.mongoliatoday.com/issue/5/triads.html
maybe there are better translations, in my language those triads sound beautiful, in translation something is lost as always

Posted by: read at September 28, 2009 08:56 PM

i'll try to find more and better translations
there are many mistakes in the link, sorry

Posted by: read at September 28, 2009 09:02 PM

Here's a direct link to read's Mongolian Triad Poetry.

Posted by: Nijma at September 29, 2009 12:10 AM

It sounds very much like one type of poetry in Old Irish and Welsh.

Posted by: marie-lucie at September 29, 2009 12:24 AM

Greek triads, Welsh triads, Triads of Ireland. Crapsey's "Triad" seems very close to the Mongolian type, although it's hard to tell about the meter.

An Irish triad:

232. Three that are most difficult to talk to : a king about his
booty, a viking in his hauberk, a boor who is under
patronage.
232. ri ima gabhail .i. im geall no chreich. aithech do mhuin coimeirce .i.
bodacha r a mbeithd hoa r coimeircen,o tenn ar cbul aige.

Posted by: Nijma at September 29, 2009 12:26 AM

oops, link malfunction fixed: Welsh triads

Posted by: Nijma at September 29, 2009 01:03 AM

A triad from Kemr, the Brito-Romance kingdom of Ill Bethisad: "Three things the Romans left us: our language, our law, and our will." I can't lay my hands on the Brithenig version at present, alas.

I wrote a diamante once on the subject of XML for a contest. The rules were given as follows:

The diamante poem is a non-rhyming seven line poem set up in a
diamond shape:
  1. One noun, which is the subject of the poem

  2. Two adjectives that describe the subject

  3. Three verbs ending in "ing" that describe the subject

  4. Four nouns or adjectives, two of which are related to the subject
    and two of which are related to the opposite subject

  5. Three verbs ending in "ing" that describe the opposite subject

  6. Two adjectives that describe the opposite subject

  7. The opposite subject

Here was my entry:

                                WXS:
                        Complex, inflexible,
                Boggling, wearying, proliferating,
        Circumscribed, inadequate.  Future-proofed, compartmentalized,
                Systematizing, pleasing, sufficing,
                     Straightforward, simplified --
                                RNG!

I added to the original rules a constraint on syllable length: the line lengths follow the binomial distribution.

Posted by: John Cowan at October 2, 2009 06:49 PM