Comments: NEW LINEAR A AND B TEXTS FOUND.

Thanks. Great map of the city.

Posted by stercus at November 16, 2005 03:40 PM

It would be interesting to know how close ancient Cretan was to the ancient languages of Anatolia Carian (Mysian, Lydian, Lycian, Pisidian). Some linguists claim that it belonged to this family. It would also be interesting to finally fin out whether Anatolian was Indo-European (even though maybe a very primitive Indo-European) or a language just outside the Indo-European family. Linguists have wavered over Hittite in this regard.

Posted by Brian at November 18, 2005 06:30 PM

What? Why shouldn't the Anatolian languages (including Hittite) be Indo-European???

Linear A is _very_ similar to Linear B. Basically it's just another font. The same holds for the "Cretan hieroglyphs" (which are simply less linear) and the script of the Phaistos Disk (which can afford to consist of meticulous "drawings" because it is stamped rather than handwritten). The language is a divergent variant of Greek, comparable to the situation of Swiss "German".

Stephen Roger Fischer: Glyphbreaker, Copernicus/Springer 1997

(If only the guy weren't _that_ bad at generating publicity. It's a pity -- the book is great.)

Posted by David Marjanović at November 18, 2005 08:24 PM

Brian, the "Indo-Hittite" concept (that Hittite split off early from a family that only later became Indo-European) is passed from the scene with the (untimely) death of Warren Cowgill. Most Indo-Europeanists believe nowadays that Hittite is squarely descended from Proto-Indo-European, although indeed possibly the first to break away.

Posted by Christopher Culver at November 18, 2005 11:50 PM

Huh. Having studied with Cowgill, I'll probably never get Indo-Hittite out of my head. Indo-European keeps changing...

Posted by language hat at November 19, 2005 08:59 AM