I read that article the other day. It was very interesting. And I didn't catch that bit of wordplay at all. Good eyes.
Posted by Kári Tulinius at May 26, 2007 12:42 AMIt took me something like four readings to see what wordplay you're getting at, so well and subtly was it done (or so tired am I). Thanks for pointing it out. :-)
Posted by Ran at May 26, 2007 02:34 AMHmm - I think I get it, but the alliteration was more obvious to me.
Posted by Sili at May 26, 2007 03:36 AMmmm...I also see some alliterations. Is that THE "clever wordplay" to which you refer, LH? Maybe I've lost my tongue, for I'm not tasting a "lot of fun". It's likeable, yes, but substantial? Maybe I'm dining at the wrong establishment.
Posted by DanW at May 26, 2007 05:16 AMFor those who missed it: "overdrawn accounts" normally refers to writing checks for more money than is in the bank accounts. Here it refers to exaggerated accounts (=stories).
Posted by language hat at May 26, 2007 08:02 AM"Lincoln’s language and its legacy" bugged me too.
The article is good, though.
Posted by John Emerson at May 26, 2007 08:33 AMAh, thanks, I got it then (in the third try or so).
It was the "fiery, folksy fighter" that hit me first.
Posted by Sili at May 26, 2007 02:30 PMSo many get so much wrong! I'm with you on the humorousness of it all. A few weeks ago a new restaurant put up their sign: 2 Guy's Grill
My wife kept telling me to shut up about how funny it was.
Posted by Damien Riley at May 26, 2007 06:44 PM"...both accounts are overdrawn", very nice.
But from your tease about "that bit of clever wordplay", I thought I was missing something about
"dir(c)ks" being "(over)drawn"....
"2 Guy's Grill"? I don't get it. Please explain.
Posted by mollymooly at May 28, 2007 10:58 AM