Comments: FAREWELL TO THE TYPEWRITER MAN.

I like that Burmese anecdote, too. What better legasy could anyone hope for?

Of course, that reminds me that we've still never had a solution to the mystery of the Burmese indiscretion at Harward (or wherehaveyou) on the Log.

Posted by Sili at October 27, 2008 04:52 PM

I still have one of those typewriters on my desk--now it's an artifact displayed to remind people of what used to be.

Posted by mj at October 27, 2008 06:12 PM

we've still never had a solution to the mystery of the Burmese indiscretion at Harward (or wherehaveyou) on the Log.

Yes, I hope someone comes up with the answer. I don't want to go to my grave still wondering about it.

Posted by language hat at October 27, 2008 07:15 PM

with the triumphant repeated ping! of the carriage return

We had one that would ping when you got within 5 characters of where you had set the right margin. It was always fun to play around with those settings--in the back there was a tab thingy you could slide back and forth on a bar to change the margins. There was something comforting about the smell and the feel of those machines. Unlike teletypes, which were a nightmare to maintain.

What is this Burmese Indiscretion of which you speak?

Posted by Nijma at October 27, 2008 07:53 PM

I heard Alan Bennett say recently that he still uses a typewriter for his work. Habit, I suppose. He said he has no difficulty procuring ribbons.

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at October 28, 2008 06:40 AM

Burmese.

Posted by language hat at October 28, 2008 08:36 AM

I had the pleasure of visiting Mr. Tytell's office many years ago in hopes of repairing a beautiful German typewriter I had found at a junk shop or a yard sale somewhere. I was young and poor, and he treated me with honor and respect, talking with me about my machine, its history, and the German recluse in New Jersey who might be convinced to assist him in its proper repair. He encouraged me that if I loved the machine and would use it I should keep it until I could afford to have it repaired, and if not I should sell it to a collector. As I recall, I did neither, but I knew I was in the presence of a legend and a true friend to typewriters of all sorts, a real kindred spirit of these very special machines. It was an experience I will never forget. May he rest in peace.

Posted by nichim at October 28, 2008 11:15 AM

In the Burma story, isn't a NY 'super' a building superintendent? I know a lot of people say building supervisor, so I guess it's moot.

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at October 28, 2008 12:05 PM

In the Burma story, isn't a NY 'super' a building superintendent? I know a lot of people say building supervisor, so I guess it's moot.

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at October 28, 2008 12:05 PM

Oh, come on. The manual typewriter deserved to die. It punished you for every spelling or typing mistake you made. I estimate I had to retype the entire text of my first book twice just for typing errors, because the publisher understandably demanded clean copy. (And I couldn't afford to pay a professional typist to retype the text, which was SOP in those days.)
I keep a couple of typewriters around in case of power failure, but only because my handwriting is illegible. (It also punishes me constantly.)

Posted by Charles Perry at October 28, 2008 12:43 PM

I for one don't mourn the passage of the typewriter, for me an instrument of frustration. Typewriters were good for people whose writing flows easily, not for those who keep changing their mind in mid-sentence and rewriting the same paragraph several times. I could never compose a text on a typewriter, I had to write everything by hand, ending up with lots of crumpled paper in the wastebasket, and even when I thought I had an acceptable text I would want to make some changes when typing it. The computer has revolutionized my life, not to mention saving a lot of trees.

Posted by marie-lucie at October 28, 2008 01:09 PM

I thought it was only those who started their serious writing in the days of the computer who changed things around the whole time (i.e. people like me). I do know that some people can write well without changing anything: Christopher Hitchens is apparently like this, to take a contemporary example. And whatever you think of his now very whacky politics, his writing isn't bad.

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at October 28, 2008 01:32 PM

OK, what is a bibdool type dog? Maybe a dhole? And what did the other Burmese do even more embarassing than being a numbers racketeer?

Posted by John Emerson at October 28, 2008 02:00 PM

I've got a lead on the Burmese Indiscretion -- will report when I've got more info.

(No idea bout the bibdool, tho.)

Posted by Ben Zimmer at October 28, 2008 02:12 PM

I've got a lead on the Burmese Indiscretion -- will report when I've got more info.

I am on tenterhooks!

Posted by language hat at October 28, 2008 02:16 PM

He's just teasing us for some nefarious purpose.

Posted by John Emerson at October 28, 2008 02:56 PM

The advantage of typewriters, in a news service situation, was that after tearing out the paper and re-typing a few times, people just got on with the story - especially features. When we moved to computers, they were able to fiddle endlessly with the text, to the frustration of the news editor (me) who wanted them to finish and get on with something else.

It usually took repeated admonitions that "it will be wrapping fish in two days' time" to end the perfectionism and get the piece on the wire.

Long live typewriters ! And buggy whips !

ITEM

Anyone got anything on "the large bibdool-type dog" ? Google hasn't ....

Posted by Paul at October 29, 2008 06:36 AM

Bibdool, does that have serifs?

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at October 29, 2008 07:18 AM

Sorry AJP, don't get it.

Posted by Paul at October 29, 2008 09:01 AM

bibdool-type ->typeface ->bibdool sounds like a typeface name

You didn't get it is because it was so pitiful.

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at October 29, 2008 10:39 AM

Bibdool Type, an italic, or even a bold type dog.

Or maybe it's a typo for drool.

Posted by Nijma at October 29, 2008 10:42 AM

I thought it was hilarious. But that's just me. I have heard it said the pun is the lowest form of humor, but wasn't Shakespeare rather fond of the pun?

Posted by Nijma at October 29, 2008 11:36 AM
I've got a lead on the Burmese Indiscretion -- will report when I've got more info.
Yay!

And my apologies for mixing up Harvard and Yale. I guess I'd best not visit Boston - ever.

Posted by Sili at October 29, 2008 05:37 PM