Comments: SPATCHCOCK.

SPATCHCOCK:I dothe like the name dispatch cock, when unannounced bodies from beyond high come to visit and expect grub, one would always send the fleetest afoot to wring neck and de-feather with blow torch the slowest bird as longer it took to be ready for devouring the longer one stayed bored.
As many of us that failed the King's 'nglis' would always lop off the front end and the rear end of any word.

Posted by scarabaeus at February 14, 2009 08:12 PM

The only other time I have encountered this word was in Alfred Bester's 1980 sf novel Golem-100, in the sentence "And Fido banged Gretchen spatchcock". I took it to be an elegant synonym for "from the rear". Seemingly not.

Oh, bbls of laughs, Alfie.

Posted by John Cowan at February 14, 2009 08:32 PM

The Spatchcock Nightmare:

http://achewood.com/index.php?date=01182008

Posted by Jesse at February 14, 2009 09:22 PM

It reminds me of Shuttlecock and Battledore, which is what my grandmother used to call the game of Badminton.

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at February 15, 2009 08:30 AM

English needs far more words suffixed in -cock in present usage.

Posted by Matt at February 15, 2009 11:57 AM

I've always wondered where this word came from, too. I think I learned it because of chicken tabaka, though I didn't find "spatchcock" in any of my English-language Russian cookbooks. It is, however, in How to Cook Everything, though author Mark Bittman refers to the technique as "spitchcock."

Posted by Lisa at February 15, 2009 02:30 PM

I assumed it to be a speciality of the Cockburn family. Though then it ought to be pronounced spatchco'.

Posted by dearieme at February 16, 2009 07:58 AM

The only time I'd ever encountered the word was in Joyce's Ulysses, chapter 9: "Why is the underplot of King Lear in which Edmund figures lifted out of Sidney's Arcadia and spatchcocked on to a Celtic legend older than history?" I'd imagined an elaborate grafting technique ... now I'm not certain what was meant. If spitting (like the adduced spitting of an eel) is the idea, that reinforces the image of attachment; on the other hand I'm intrigued by the idea that Joyce may have meant to emphasize Shakespeare's improvisation via the sense of "dispatch cock."

Anyone with a better sense of the word (there seem to be many here) able to come up with a better gloss of Joyce's sense? I'd weigh JJ's evidence pretty heavily in the "where the word is felt to come from" scales (assuming he didn't just crib it from Skeat's Dictionary, of course).

One more thing, apropos of its "satisfying consonant-ladenness": I had the idea that Joyce had left off the first c, making it "spatchocked." Without digging after the mss evidence I have no idea if that is me misremembering, or one of many printer's errors in the history of Ulysses, but it would be curious if he'd either emended the word on grounds of euphony, or meant to record actual (spoken) usage of his acquaintance.

Posted by andrew at February 18, 2009 10:04 AM

Excellent question; you sent me to my well-worn copy of Gifford's Notes for Joyce, where I found:

"'Spatchocked' according to A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue by Capt. Francis Grose (1785), involves an abbreviation of 'dispatch cook,' an Irish dish prepared in an emergency; thus it means to insert, interpolate or sandwich (a phrase, sentence, etc.). Usually spelled 'spatchcock.'"

It's "Spatchocked" in my old Modern Library edition, but apparently it's been corrected in more recent ones, as a Google search shows. (Note "cook" for "cock" in the Grove quote; I don't know whether the error is Gifford's or whether he picked it up elsewhere.)

Posted by language hat at February 18, 2009 10:47 AM

Found an interesting site, if only for the comparison of Yahoo's and Bill Gates' pronunciations of "spatchcock."

Posted by Codfish at February 18, 2009 11:04 AM

And that site is...?

Posted by language hat at February 18, 2009 11:28 AM

So where's the site, Codfish?

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at February 18, 2009 11:31 AM

Damn!

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at February 18, 2009 11:32 AM

Whoops! Tried to code it in but failed.

http://www.nakedwhiz.com/spatchdef.htm

Posted by Codfish at February 18, 2009 11:33 AM

(They've been sick, you know.)

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at February 18, 2009 11:33 AM

Who's the yahoo trying to sound British?

It has been said that the English will adamantly tell you that the only definition of "spatchcock" is a young chicken, no more than 6 weeks old.
But that definition would apply to most of the chicken that's sold today, wouldn't it, Codfish? You're supposed to get one that's 12 weeks old, aren't you?

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at February 18, 2009 11:40 AM

Here's an interesting definition from there:

Forthright's Favorite Words
http://phrontistery.50megs.com/favourite.html

spatchcock (spach'kok) v or n (English, probably from dispatch and cock) To insert into a text too hurriedly or inappropriately; a fowl stuffed and cooked immediately after killing. This is probably my favourite word of all time. Though there's little use for it any more as a noun, the idea of hurriedly killing, stuffing and cooking a bird has enormous metaphorical value. As a verb, spatchcock is a term that should be picked up and used by every editor who has ever had to read a manuscript that has been prepared in such a manner.

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at February 18, 2009 11:46 AM

It has been said that the English will adamantly tell you that the only definition of "spatchcock" is a young chicken, no more than 6 weeks old.
But that definition would apply to most of the chicken that's sold today, wouldn't it, Codfish? You're supposed to get one that's 12 weeks old, aren't you?

I think they mean cockerels, preferably younger than 6 weeks old, because their meat is tender and they are small enough (1-2 pounds) to cook quickly on a 'cue and who needs more than a couple roosters, anyway?

Cornish game hens and spring chickens are sold in supermarkets. They are 5-6 week old chickens (male or female, though that seems a waste of eggs to me) but I don't trust them because regular 'broilers' are also about 6 weeks old and they are twice, or thrice, the size of cornishes. But I don't trust much from the supermarket.

We do get chickens aged 12 weeks and there's a world of difference. I'm sure if we ate a cockerel from that farm it'd be delicious.

Hope to raise my own sometime and bring them up to 30. Jamessal? You in?

Posted by Codfish at February 18, 2009 01:08 PM

Hens are delightful animals. I like Salmon Faverolles the best, they are my favorites, but I also like Buff Orpingtons. Both give lots of eggs. We had a very charismatic Welsummer rooster who was very bright and brave, until he was attacked by a dog while defending the others. Poor Leopold, he was a lot brighter than Jussi, our Orpington rooster who was his assistant. i never thought Rhode Island Reds made great pets.

Posted by A.J.P. Crown at February 18, 2009 02:34 PM

Codfish: You know it, babe!

Crown: Now you're just showing off. And you might regret it -- we will show up at your door. (By the "yahoo trying to sound British," by the way, do you mean the sexy one? Maybe I'm being provincial, or just immature, but he sounds to me like he's getting into it.)

Posted by jamessal at February 18, 2009 04:38 PM

I like that the website for the Buff Orpingtons call them "big, friendly dual-purpose birds."

Now, does the "dual-purpose" mean eggs and meat or friendship and meat? Maybe there's three purposes. Why limit?

Posted by Codfish at February 18, 2009 08:41 PM

It's a floor wax... and a desert topping!

Posted by language hat at February 19, 2009 08:22 AM